Tagged: Saudi Arabia

Bandar-controlled terrorists threaten Russia

By Yusuf Fernandez
Mon Oct 28, 2013 10:47AM GMT

Saudi spymaster Bandar bin Sultan

Saudi spymaster Bandar bin Sultan
During his recent visit to Moscow, some weeks ago, Saudi intelligence chief Bandar bin Sultan told Russian President Vladimir Putin that Saudi-controlled militants in the Caucasus will not disrupt the Winter Olympic Games in Sochi only if Russia backed away from its support for Syria. Putin reportedly rejected the proposal.

“We know that you have supported the Chechen terrorist groups for a decade. And that support, which you have frankly talked about just now, is completely incompatible with the common objectives of fighting global terrorism that you mentioned”, Putin is said to have answered.
There are good reasons for Bandar and the Saudi ruling family to be angry at Russia (and lately at the US, too). Saudi Arabia´s plans against Shiites and the Axis of Resistance in the Middle East have been undermined by Russian policies in Syria, Iran and elsewhere. Bandar planned to overthrow Bashar al Assad in Syria through a US attack and the action of terrorist groups there, to isolate and destroy Hezbollah and to push Washington into a confrontation with Tehran.
However, Bandar clearly misunderstood Russia, Iran and Hezbollah and their determination to support their Syrian ally and to defeat his plans. Russia deployed a powerful fleet in Eastern Mediterranean and made it clear that it was willing to support and protect Syria.
Therefore, Bandar could try to take revenge on Russia through his terrorist tools. This is of course insane, but his threats to Russia (and now to the US) are themselves evidence of his insanity and stupidity and led the world public opinion to understand that the Saudi regime itself is a real problem for the region and the world.
Extremist groups and the Olympic Games Terrorist groups tied to Saudi Arabia and other countries have been operating in the North Caucasus for years. According to Syria’s Grand Mufti Sheikh Ahmad Badreddin Hassoun, who recently visited the Islamic University of Moscow, “there are around 2,000 extremists from Russia fighting in Syria.” He said that “among the fighters, there are people from Chechnya and Dagestan in the Caucasus as well as those of Tatarstan in central Russia”.
According to the Lebanese daily As Safir, which quoted the director of the Russian site Qafqaz Ozil, Gregory Chavidov, “the Russian extremists have gained experience in the war in Syria. They have learned to fight in cities. Up to now, the terrorists in the Caucasus did not enjoy such experience. And when they return home and organize their ranks, they will certainly represent a major threat.” He added that “Sochi is seriously exposed to attacks by extremist groups who took part in street battles in Syria, in spite of all measures taken to ensure security for the Olympic Winter Games.”
The ringleader of the terrorists in the Russian Caucasus Doku Umarov threatened last July to disrupt the Olympic Winter Games, promising that he would try by all means to prevent the games from taking place. Umarov has reached a deal with Emir Salautdin, who controls North Caucasus militants in Syria, for those militants to return to Russia to fight under his command. Umarov has proclaimed the North Caucasus an independent state, calling it Imarat Kaukaz (The Caucasus Emirate). The Russian expert said that “if the Russian militants return to the country, responding to Umarov’s call, it would represent a serious concern.”
For his part, Russian President Vladimir Putin has expressed concern over the return of Russian militants who are currently fighting against Syrian forces. He wrote in a recent article published in the New York Times, “We cannot but be concerned about the presence of hundreds of extremists from Western countries and even Russia, who are fighting Syria. Who can assure us that these people, with their experience in Syria, will not come back to our country? This is a real threat to us all.”
The Russian President called on the country’s Muslim leaders to work together with state authorities in order to counter these radical movements. “Radical movements, which have never been popular among Russian Muslims seek to weaken our state and to create foreign-managed conflicts in the Russian territory”, he said.
Putin has set up a clear policy, which aims at combating extremist groups wherever it is possible and necessary, with no concerns for other factors. The current civil war in Syria is considered by the Russian president a continuation of his fight in Chechnya and this is a message easily understandable by the majority of Russians.
Putin has ordered Russian intelligence agencies to step up their efforts in Northern Caucasus and has issued a decree reducing the freedom of movement and assembly near the Sochi resort. “Despite the obvious positive changes, the situation in the North Caucasus is improving too slowly,” Putin said. “Terrorist threats, uncertainties regarding safety have not been permanently eradicated”.
The Russian concern has been fuelled by the terrorist attack on October 22 in Volvograd. Six people were killed and 37 were injured – some of them critically – after a female suicide bomber, Naida Asivalova, from Dagestan, set off a bomb on a bus in Volgograd, central Russia.
Recently, a Russian citizen, Sergei Gorbunov, was also captured by “extremist militants” in Syria, who threatened to “slaughter” him if Russia and Syria did not exchange him through the Red Cross for a native of Saudi Arabia named Khaled Suleiman. He was reportedly taken hostage by militants from the Jaish al-Muhajireen wal-Ansar (Army of Emigrants and Supporters). This group is led by Abu Omar al Chechen and is manned by volunteers from the Caucasus.
On the other hand, Bandar’s claims that Saudi Arabia controls Chechen terrorist groups has also raised new questions about the April 15 Boston Marathon bombing. The Tsarnaev brothers, who allegedly carried out the attacks, had close family links to Chechen extremist groups in Russia. The elder brother, Tamerlan, traveled to the region to contact such groups.
Threats from Afghanistan The Caucasus is not the only region where extremist groups are acting against Russia. While NATO forces are preparing the pull-out of their troops from Afghanistan, Moscow is increasingly concerned that this fact will increase the threat for Russia and its allies in Central Asia. It already happened in the 1980s, when the CIA and Bandar supported “Muyahideen” who were fighting against Soviet troops in Afghanistan as a part of a more comprehensive plan to spread the extremist ideology within the boundaries of the Soviet Union and thus create problems and weaken the latter.
Russia recently announced that it would reinforce its military contingents in Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan ahead of the US withdrawal. The head of Russian GRU military intelligence agency, Igor Sergun, said that the current situation in Afghanistan was “a serious challenge to international stability”.
Russia maintains some big military bases in Central Asia and around 7,000 Russian soldiers are deployed there. Seven hundred soldiers are stationed in Kyrgyzstan, especially in the Kant air base near the capital, Bishkek. In Tajikistan, Russian land forces of the 201st Motorized Rifle Division have their own base and both countries have started negotiations on the use of the Ayni air base by Russian military, too. However, Russian experts consider that the existing network of Russian bases is not sufficient to protect Tajikistan´s long border with Afghanistan in the case of a conflict.
The governments of Tajikistan and Uzbekistan have been fighting against the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU), which is supported by the Taliban. After suffering heavy losses in the Afghan war, the IMU´s activities are now limited to the south of Tajikistan, although there are also reports pointing to the presence of this group in other Central Asian republics.

Are The Clintons In Trouble Again?

by

October 23, 2013

 

Photo credit: InSapphoWeTrust (Creative Commons)

Conflicts of interest seem to follow the Clintons with total impunity. While  Hillary (and the frothing liberal media) are gearing up for her probable run in  2016, they appear to ignore all conflicts of interest (and even, reportedly, a  possible 47 mysterious murders or deaths surrounding acquaintances or business  associates of those two.)

There was some deal struck between Obama and the Clintons before he appointed  her to be Sec. of State. In Nov 2007, he invited her to be with him on his  plane.  No one seems to know what transpired there. He didn’t want her too  close to him as V.P, but he owed her something.

The alarm bells began ringing, not only because of the Clintons’ long history  of corruption– the long list of women abused and smeared, but also their  propensity to peddle influence to the highest bidder. How could this compromise  or influence U.S. Diplomatic policy? The possibilities for high stakes dealing  were endless.

In 2011, Judicial Watch, a government watchdog, began asking questions and  seeking information, only to be stonewalled by Obama and his administration.  Now, they are forced to go to the court to get this needed information.  On  May 28, 2013, a FOIA lawsuit was filed by JW against the Dept. of State to  obtain documents of possible conflicts of interest between the actions taken by  Hillary Clinton as Sec. of State and Bill’s activities with his Global  Initiative. The following records are sought with any and all certifications or  divestiture for Mrs. Clinton:

  • Any waivers issued to or for Mrs. Clinton, or anything applicable (ethics  stature, regulation, or agreements.)
  • Any and all records of communication, including phone logs related to Mr.  Clinton’s speech schedule.
  • Any and all communications including but not limited to e-mail, fax reports,  and phone logs related to Mr. Clinton’s personal or charitable financial  relationship with foreign leaders and governments. The State has failed to  produce any record to these requests.

In the meantime, the former President released a list of 200,000 donors to  his library and foundation with what he termed a deal between Obama and  Hillary.This deal reportedly included nine conditions  to which Bill  agreed, including a ban on foreign government contributions to the Clinton  Global Initiative. According to an AP story, Saudi Arabia gave $25 million to  the foundation. Other government donors include Norway, Kuwait, Qator,  Brunei, Onan, and more.

This is about the potential undermining of our national interest in exchange  for contributions to the Clinton’s coffers (for Hillary to build up for her 2016  run?)

The ethics division of the State Dept. appointed Cheryl Mills (Clinton’s  former deputy counsel) to review these conditions. Ms. Mills tried to silence  Gary Hicks in the Benghazi hearings. She was also named Sec. of State’s  Hillary’s chief of staff.

But, as Hillary said, “What Difference Does it Make?”

Related articles

Pentagon to sell bunker busters, cruise missiles to Gulf monarchies in $11bn deal

Written by RT News

Published time: October 18, 2013 08:50

 

sdb3_si

The Pentagon plans to sell $10.8 billion worth of advanced weaponry to Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. The hardware includes bunker buster bombs and cruise missiles.

The planned deal includes shipping 1,000 GBU-39/B bombs to Saudi  Arabia and 5,000 to the UAE, AFP reports. They have air-deployed  wings, which allow them to strike targets as far away as 110km.  Their warheads can penetrate up to a meter of reinforced  concrete.

The planned sale also includes sophisticated Standoff Land Attack  Extended Range (SLAM-ER) and Joint Standoff Weapons (JSOW) cruise  missiles. Both are meant for destroying surface targets from a  long distance, allowing warplanes to stay out of the range of  enemy air defenses.

The Saudis will purchase 650 of the Boeing-manufactured SLAM-ERs  and 973 Raytheon-made JSOWs, as well as other missiles. They  are to pay $6.8 billion for the hardware, parts, training and  logistical support.

The United Arab Emirates is due to buy $4 billion worth of  weaponry, including the bunker buster bombs, 300 SLAM-ERs and  1,200 JSOW missiles.

An F/A-18E “Super Hornet” strike-fighter launches a Stand-Off Land Attack Missile/Extended Range (SLAM/ER), (AFP Photo / US Navy / Cpt. Dana Potts)

 

slam-er

The planned deal will be the first time the US delivers the  sophisticated gliding bombs and missiles to the region.

Back in April, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel announced plans to  sell $10 billion worth of arms to Israel, Saudi Arabia and the  UAE. This week’s announcement details the munitions that the Gulf  monarchies are seeking.

DoD officials informed the Congress of the planned deal last  week. Legislators have 30 days to block the sale, but this is  unlikely to happen considering the US’ previous weapon deals with its Gulf allies.

In 2011, the US signed a $29.4 billion deal with Saudi Arabia to  sell 84 Boeing-made F-15 jets and upgrade 70 planes already owned  by the kingdom. The Obama administration has also sold the UAE an  anti-missile system called the Terminal High-Altitude Area  Defense.

The deal comes amid a period of rapprochement between the US and  its long-time Middle Eastern foe Iran. Tehran and Washington have  made a number of moves which may indicate a swift resolution to  the conflict over Iran’s nuclear program and the lifting of  economic sanctions the US imposed over it.

The development has unnerved America’s autocratic allies in the  region, which see Iran as their main regional rival. The weapons  deal may be seen as Washington’s gesture to boost confidence in  Riyadh and other Gulf capitals.

Financial Intelligence: Did Saudi Intelligence Chief and Other High-Ranking Officials “Trade on Inside Information” Regarding 9/11?

Global Research

By Washington’s Blog

October 17, 2013

911

Did Connected Insiders Cynically Trade On Impending Attacks?

Mass surveillance by the NSA and other government agencies is not really making us safer, but is being used for other reasons.

For example:

Saudi Prince Bandar – head of Saudi intelligence – helped to arm the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan, and is now arming Al Qaeda in Syria. (Background).

Respected financial writer Ambrose Evans-Pritchard says that Prince Bandar admitted that Saudi Arabia carries out false flag terror.  Indeed,  U.S. government officials say that the Saudi government had a hand in 9/11.

Moreover, several financial and economic experts – such as Jim Rickards, Max Keiser, German central bank president Ernst Welteke, Swiss economists Remo Crameri, Marc Chesney, Loriano Mancini and Bill Bergman (senior financial markets policy analyst for the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago for 13 years) – say that there were insider trades right before 9/11 by people who knew the attacks were coming … people  with “no conceivable ties to al-Qaeda” according to the 9/11 Commission.

You don’t have to believe that 9/11 was an inside job to believe that this theory is at least possible. After all, 9/11 was foreseeable to people in intelligence services worldwide … as was Al Qaeda flying planes into the World Trade Center and Pentagon.

For example, the NSA, CIA and other intelligence agencies were listening in on the hijackers’ calls, and an FBI informant rented a room to two of the hijackers in San Diego.

Now, Max Keiser alleges that this story is about to be blown wide open:

Within a few months, there’s a book coming out by a friend of mine who’s already had a very popular book which went to the top of the New York Times Bestseller list. It’s a new book, he’s shown me the gallies. Chapter 1: talks about his eyewitness accounts being in the room in the CIA discussing trading inside information days ahead of 9/11. He’s talking about [Saudi intelligence chief Prince] Bandar, he’s talking about Tony Blair, he’s talking about [then executive director of the CIA] Buzzy Krongard.

Is Keiser right? Will the book really be published, and will it really make this allegation? Is the former CIA officer and bestselling author credible?

 

We’ll have to wait to find out.

Israel, KSA seek to destroy Syria: Expert

Press TV.
Sunday Oct 13, 2013
A Middle East expert says the Israeli regime and Saudi Arabia have formed a hard-line faction of the neo-conservatives aimed at destroying Syria to serve Tel Aviv’s interests, Press TV reports.

“They (Israelis and the Saudis) have been virtually merging into one country of Saudi-Israelia and the hard-line faction of neo-conservatives here in the US that want to destroy Syria for Israel, turn it into three small balkanized little states and go through Syria in an attack on Iran,” Kevin Barrett said.
He added that Western media keep silent about the violence and carnage in Syria while the Western governments are actually arming and supplying the so-called insurgents to commit their share.
The commentator said that the Western governments are allying themselves with al-Qaeda, adding they were complicit in the murder of the US Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens over a year ago.
Last year, clashes broke out at the US consulate in Libya’s Benghazi after a group of people held a demonstration to protest against a blasphemous movie that insults Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and depicts Islam as an oppressive religion.
US Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens and three staff members of the US consulate were killed during the clashes at the mission building. According to a US official, at least five other Americans were also wounded in the scuffles.
Barrett said it was a “terrible mistake” by everyone involved to create a civil war in Syria.

“The only party that is really going to benefit from this is the Israelis who have managed to smash a large and coherent country on the borders they are occupying. Now the Israelis are never going to have to worry about giving back the Golan Heights of Syria, it is fully destroyed. That is the end game of this Syrian civil war,” the analyst pointed out.

Human Rights Watch (HRW) released a report on Friday saying the Takfiri militants in Syria killed 190 civilians and held over 200 others hostage in the country’s western province of Latakia in August alone.
The 105-page report was compiled based upon on-site investigation and interviews with 35 people, including the survivors of the attacks.
According to the report, in some cases, the extremists executed or gunned down entire families. A vast majority of the hostages are also women and children.
Since the outbreak of the turmoil in Syria in March 2011, several video clips have been released showing the grisly crimes perpetrated by the foreign-sponsored terrorists against innocent civilians in the country.
A very large number of the militants in the Arab country are reportedly foreign nationals.

Drug Smugglers ‘Getting Away With It’ As 649,000 Emails Deleted From Government System

uk

Posted: 09/10/2013

 

ametxrvg60942

Good news for drug smugglers targeting Britain – the UK border agency has managed to delete more than 649,000 potential alerts on banned goods arriving in the country last year from its system.

The bungle has meant staff at the border have been significantly hindered in their ability to seize banned goods and arrest smugglers, the Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration John Vine said.

Shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper has called on Theresa May to “stop drug-smuggling information being deleted and get the proper border controls in place rather than relying on divisive gimmicks like ad vans instead.

“The Home Secretary must urgently explain why hundreds of thousands of possible drug-smuggling records were deleted in 2012 without having ever been read.

Mr Vine uncovered the deletions as part of an inspection into the multimillion-pound eBorders programme, set up by the Home Office 10 years ago to prevent passengers from travelling where they were considered a threat to the UK.

The programme involved the collection of Advance Passenger Information (API) for all scheduled inbound and outbound passengers, in advance of travel – which is then checked against terror and criminal watch lists.

The inspector also found that the e-borders programme had not delivered the planned increases in passenger data collection, with only 65% of all passenger movements into and out of the UK covered, due to complications surrounding European law.

Mr Vine said: “Despite being in development for over a decade, and costing over half a billion pounds, the e-borders programme has yet to deliver many of the anticipated benefits originally set out in 2007.”

He added: “I was surprised that the use of e-Borders information to “export the border” by preventing the arrival of a passenger because they had either been deported or excluded from the UK previously, was not happening.

“The Home Office should now define clearly what the aims of the e-borders programme are ahead of the new procurement exercise, and be transparent about what e-borders will deliver and by when.”

The IT platform procured to test the e-Borders concept – known as Semaphore – continues to be used pending procurement of a fully capable e-Borders IT system, the report said.

Mr Vine found that records relating to drug and tobacco smuggling were deleted from Semaphore over a 10-month period due to “poor data quality and the prioritisation of immigration over customs work”.

The report said: “These deletions had a significant impact on the ability of staff at the border to seize prohibited and restricted goods and deal with those responsible.”

This amounted to three quarters of all the customs work completed at National Border Targeting Centre (NBTC), the hi-tech hub where watch-list checks on passengers entering and leaving Britain are carried out, his report said.

Keith Vaz, chair of the Home Affairs Select Committee, which is responsible for scrutinising the work of the Home Office, said: “The e-borders programme has been a disaster for successive governments and is a classic example of how not to procure.

“The promise for e-borders to secure our borders is simple and has been successfully implemented in Australia, South Africa and Saudi Arabia.

“Yet this ongoing saga has cost taxpayers hundreds of millions of pounds.

“It is essential for our national security that exit checks are implemented as a matter of urgency.”

Conspiracy Theories Making More Sense Than Obama’s Claims

 September 11, 2013

Saudi Arabia SC Conspiracy theories making more sense than Obama’s claims

Are Saudi Arabia and Qatar trying to get Obama to bomb Syria back to the Middle Ages so they can run that big gas pipeline through Syria?  Is that the real back story here, an attempt by the inscrutable Arabs to pimp America’s military to do their work even as such actions would destroy Assad and support Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood?

A “Vanity” posting on Free Republic, dated Sept 6, urges Americans to call Congress and say: “I know about the gas pipeline Saudi Arabia and Qatar want to run through Syria and Assad won’t let them!” The poster goes on to say that “They [the Saudi’s] want Obama to pimp our troops to do their fighting against Assad for the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Qaeda!”

And a “Freedom Outpost” contributor says the Muslim Brotherhood and Barack Hussein Obama may be closer or more connected than originally revealed. This quote is thrown up against the web wall: “I don’t know if he is a card carrying member, but he clearly is a huge supporter of these various jihadists!” The name Shadi Hamid is associated with this rhetoric, but the name may or may not be just a generic Arabic moniker thrown out there to stir the roiling Middle Eastern pot even more.

TheBlaze.com is leaning toward conspiracy theories evolving out of the Egyptian Street’s “dissatisfaction with the Obama administration policy some have viewed as pro Muslim Brotherhood.” That famous photo still careening around the web of Obama bowing low to the Saudi King isn’t helping his “bomb, bomb, bomb Syria” lyric either.

Al Jazeera America on Friday quoted Iranian Supreme Leader Khamenei, who said, “The West is using allegations of chemical weapons as pretext for attacking Syria.”  Qassem Soleimani, chief of Iran’s elite Quds force unit warns, “We will support Syria to the end!”

The irony of President Obama sending a video greeting to the Muslim Brotherhood holding its big annual convention in Chicago on the very day he announced his plans to bomb Syria is simply stunning.  You can view the entire video to hear Obama praise the Muslim Bros for “the myriad of ways the American Muslim Community and specifically ISNA (Islamic Society of North America) leadership has served as an effective partner in promoting inter-religious initiatives in the US and religious freedom for minorities around the world!” This amazing praise to an Islamic organization alleged in some quarters to be connected to the destruction of some 80 Christian churches near Damascus last week stings stateside.

Report: Saudi Arabia Sent More Than 1,200 Death Row Prisoners To Fight In Syria

Posted by icarus

09 Sep 2013

Syrian-Rebels-Getty

I have been saying for the past 18 months now – Syria is not a civil war … it is a covert proxy war between the U.S., Sunni gulf states and Israel vs. Syria, Iran and Russia.  You could throw in Hezbollah if you want to.  While President Obama pushes for America’s next war to be in Syria what isn’t being said is that really President Bashar Al-Assad is just fighting back against terrorism and militias intent to overthrow his government.  I’ve shared my disdain for President Assad many times and I’m no friend to the dictator’s wants; however – that doesn’t change the facts.

As I have already laid out HERE – there are a whole host of reasons not to support an American attack on Syria.  And despite how the American media typically frames what’s happening in Syria as a civil war … it’s really not.  Bashar al-Assad is fighting a lot of foreign mercenaries.  Now – there are some Syrians trying to fight against the government; some of them really want him gone and others have no other way to feed their family now that the Syrian economy has imploded over the past 24 months.

Al-Assad (like his father) has been in power a long time and the only reason this is happening is because Sunni states like Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE and Egypt are concerned about an expanding Iranian influence in the Middle East. And because the U.S. really wants to make Iran its 51st state (they have a lot of oil).  And in this case – Saudi prisoners were given a choice … either we cut off your heads or you go fight in a war for us.  Not surprisingly – more than 1,200 Saudi prisoners decided to go fight the Syrian government. The USA Today had the story in January of this year HERE:

Citing what it calls a “top secret memo” in April from the Ministry of Interior, AINA says the Saudi offered 1,239 inmates a pardon and a monthly stipend for their families, which were were allowed to stay in the Sunni Arab kingdom. Syrian President Bashar Assad is an Alawite, a minority Shiite sect. According to an English translation of the memo, besides Saudis, the prisoners included Afghans, Egyptians, Iraqis, Jordanians, Kuwaitis, Pakistanis, Palestinians, Somalis, Sudanese, Syrians and Yemenis. All faced “execution by sword” for murder, rape or drug smuggling.

Perhaps that is why Al-Qaeda is fighting in Syria to take down the Assad government.  And as we have already shared HERE – you have these people on the same side as the Americans cutting out Syrian soldiers’ hearts and eating them on videotape.  That is who we are supporting financially.

 

The War on Syria and Noam Chomsky Print This ShareThis

By Ghali Hassan. Axis of Logic

Axis of Logic
Wednesday, Sep 4, 2013

 

“The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion, but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact, non-Westerners never do.”

– Samuel P. Huntington, 1996, p.51.

For centuries, Western imperialism has terrorised the world, using violence to occupy lands and expropriate resources and markets. From Asia and the Middle East to Africa, millions of innocent people, mostly women and children have been killed to satisfy Western appetite for violence and barbarism, and millions more have become displaced and refugees. Enhance by sophisticated false propaganda to manipulate public opinions and justify aggression, Western imperialism led by the U.S. is the greatest menace to the survival of humanity today.
After more than two years of covert war, including economic sanctions on food and medicine, the U.S. and its allies or vassals (France, Britain and Israel in particular) are preparing their armies to wage overt aggressive war on the people of Syria citing the same lie that led to the bloodbath in Iraq, “chemical weapons”. As most people know, the U.S. war on the Iraqi people was one of the most unjust barbaric wars that have ever been inflicted on defenceless nations, a major international crime.

Sadly, the thirst for another bloodbath among Western imperialists is as big as ever. In order to sell the war to the American people and world public, Western leaders invoke the Nazi’s beloved phrase of “humanitarian intervention” as a “moral justification”.  It is the same “moral justification” that terrorised the Iraqi people and caused the deaths of more than one-and-a-half million innocent Iraqis, mostly women and children. After more than a decade of murderous military occupation, Iraq –once a progressive nation and an envy of many nations – is a deliberately destroyed cauldron of violence, human misery and deprivation for everyone to see. Instability and violence have gripped Iraq since the murderous invasion. Libya is the same. The West-invented “Humanitarian intervention” is a convenient tool to manipulate public opinions and mask Western violence as a “just war”.
The U.S. and its vassals are accusing (without credible evidence) the Syrian Government of using “chemical weapons against civilians”. The chemical attack in Syria is one of many lies fabricated by the Mossad (the Israeli Gestapo) and fed to the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and then spread by the Israeli and Western media. It is a planned and baseless pretext to justify aggression. The current UN team investigating the chemical attack was takes its orders from Washington and was instructed by the U.S. to only determine if chemical weapons had been used and not who used them.  According to Michael Mandel, a professor of Law at Osgoode Hall Law School of York University in Canada, “because the U.S. promised to intervene militarily if gas were used, giving the [terrorists] who are on the run [chased by the Syrian Army] a huge incentive to use it and giving the Syrian Government an equally huge disincentive”.

Carla Del Ponte, UN Commissioner on Syria

According to the Minnesota Mint Press News (29 August 2013), Syrian residents in Ghouta have confirmed that Saudi-armed terrorists were behind the chemical attack on their neighbourhood on the outskirt of the Syrian Capital Damascus. In a detailed report on the use of chemical weapons in Syria by UN commissioner on Syria, Carla Del Ponte stated:
“Our investigators have been interviewing victims, doctors and field hospitals. According to their report of last week, which I have seen, there are strong, concrete suspicions but not yet incontrovertible proof of the use of sarin gas, from the way the victims were treated. I was a little bit stupefied by the first indications we got … they were about the use of nerve gas by the opposition.”
However, the U.S. dismissed the report and insisted on an “inspection” that covers all Syria.  A recent Russian report presented to the UN Security Council, show that the Western-backed terrorists were responsible for the March 2013 chemical attack in Khan al-Assad.

In Dec. 2012 the US State Dept. posted a declaration describing the Al-Nusra Front as an alias of Al-Qaeda in Iraq. The group has claimed responsibility for killing scores of people and stated its plan to replace the Assad gov’t with a strict Islamic state.

Furthermore, in May 2013, OE Watch reported that Turkish security forces found sarin gas in the homes of suspected Western-backed (al-Nusra terrorists).
The gas was reportedly to be used to make bombs. It is most likely that, Israel, the C.I.A., Saudi Arabia, Britain and France are complicit in supplying the terrorists with chemical weapons in order to justify Western aggression against Syria. In fact U.S. President Obama (indirectly) suggested the use of chemical weapons by drawing a “red line” on their use. That is, if chemical weapons are used, we will go to war. Therefore, the U.S. and Israel have an obvious motive in accusing the Syrian Government of using chemical weapons.

A schematic of a white phosphorus bomb as used against the Palestinian people in Gaza on January 3, 2009. Is this not a chemical weapon? Israel also used white phosphorus in its 34-day war with Hezbollah in Lebanon in 2006 (and lost). The U.S. military in Iraq also used this weapon during a November 2004 operation against insurgents in the city of Fallujah.

One wonders why when Israel and the U.S. use chemical weapons, including white phosphorus, napalm, cluster bombs, and depleted uranium to murder innocent civilians (in broad daylight), most Western governments and the media turned blind eye. In the 2008/2009 the Israeli fascist regime killed over 1500, innocent civilians, including 400 children in unprovoked attacks on an entirely defenceless and besieged population of the Gaza Concentration Camp in Palestine. Despite world-wide condemnation of the Israeli regime, John Kerry and the mostly Zionist U.S. Congress rushed to praise Israel’s terror and provided Israel with more cash, weapons, including white phosphorous and cluster bombs and diplomatic backing. There were no red lines in Palestine or in Iraq, except those drawn in Palestinians and Iraqis blood. The U.S. and its vassals view war crimes through an imperialist lens of “how this serves our interests”.

Photo: A white phosphorus bomb raining down on Palestinians in Gaza in 2009. New York medical staff reported on the toxicity of white phosphorus:

“Oral ingestion of white phosphorus in humans has been demonstrated to result in pathologic changes to the liver and kidneys. The ingestion of a small quantity of white phosphorus can cause gastrointestinal complaints such as nausea, abdominal cramps, and vomiting. Individuals with a history of oral ingestion have been noted to pass phosphorus-laden stool (“smoking stool syndrome”). The accepted lethal dose is 1 mg/kg, although the ingestion of as little as 15 mg has resulted in death.” – Medscape

Like Iraq and Libya, Syria is targeted on behalf of the fascist state of Israel. The aim is to control the Middle East military by destroying any resistance to Israel’s fascist (Zionist) ideology. After the atrocity in Libya, the U.S. and its allies resorted to using proxy terrorists to implement their imperialist agenda. The so-called “rebels” (a common euphemism for Western-backed terrorists in Western media) are a collection of U.S.-Israel backed terrorists and foreign mercenaries. They are openly recruited, trained, armed, and directed by the U.S., Israel, NATO members and U.S. allies, including the disgraceful and corrupt dictators of the Middle East – Jordan, Qatar, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, etc. (New York Times). In short, they are foot soldiers used to facilitate Western military invasions and the destabilisation of the region. If the so-called “rebels” are truly Muslims fighting for democracy, why are they destroying Syria and terrorising the Syrian people?
True Muslims do not fight on U.S.-Israel’s side against fellow Muslims. However, associating the terrorists with Islam is part of the U.S.-Israel racist campaign to demonise Islam and justify war against Muslims. Like Iraq and Libya, once Syria has been completely destroyed, a group of U.S.-trained expatriates and criminals will be installed as a “government” to legitimise the expropriation of the nation’s land, natural resources and market. The terrorists will be encouraged to fight each other for turf or will be airlifted to soften and prepare the ground of the next target. Just take a look at what is happening in the Middle East. Israel is the biggest and only beneficiary of this “creative chaos” strategy.

Gilbert Achcar Bernard Henry-Levy Fawaz Gerges

The Western-orchestrated “Arab Spring” provides a useful platform not only for anti-Muslim neo-fascist, such as Gilbert Achcard, Bernard-Henry Levy and Fawaz Gerges to promote their hostility to Islam, but also an opportunity for Western apologists to show their loyalty and obsequiousness to Western imperialism. A careful reading of the “Left” liberals’ response to the Western-backed terror in Syria, reveals that the “Left” liberals have display a staggering level of complacency, complicity and outright hostility to the Syrian people. Representatives of the milieu of the “Left” liberals led by the like of Noam Chomsky have lost credibility. Their arguments are part of the standard propaganda talking points that serve Israel-U.S. Zionist ideology. Strikingly, not only the “Left” liberals failed to think about Israel-U.S. Zionist ideology, they made serious efforts to spread Western propaganda that the war on Syria is a “civil war” between Syrians.

Noam Chomsky

Noam Chomsky, the darling of the “Left” and the so-called “arguably the most important intellectual alive today” is leading the propaganda campaign. In recent interviews, Chomsky, engaged in, what can best be described as, highly misleading imperialist propaganda. On 16 June 2013, Chomsky, told al-akhbar newspaper: “First of all, Israel was not opposed to Assad. He has been more or less the kind of dictator they wanted. He has done the kind of things they wanted. The U.S. has no opposition to Assad. He was cooperating on intelligence and they did not like everything, but he was pretty satisfactory.” (Al-akhbar English, 16 June 2013). The same propaganda was repeated on The Republic website:

“Israel has done nothing to indicate that it is trying to bring down the Assad regime. There are growing claims that the West intends to supply the opposition with arms. I believe this is quite misleading. The fact of the matter is, that were the United States and Israel interested in bringing down the Syrian regime there is a whole package of measures they could take before they came to the arms-supply option. All these other options remain available, including, for example, America encouraging Israel to mobilize its forces along the northern border, a move that would not produce any objections from the international community and which would compel the regime to withdraw its forces from a number of frontline positions and relieve the pressure on the opposition. But this has not happened, nor will it, so long as America and Israel remain unwilling to bring down Assad regime. They may not like the regime, but it is nevertheless a regime that is well practiced in accommodating their demands and any unknown alternative might prove worse in this respect. Much better, then, to watch the Syrians fight and destroy each other”.

What a distortion of reality by Chomsky?

Israel’s Missile attack on port city of Latakia

Chomsky distortion of reality is based on a deeply-entrenched Zionist belief, that Israel is innocent of any crimes. To paraphrase Frantz Fanon, Chomsky has shown that he is unable to deal to cognitive dissonance and has worked hard to “protect his core belief, often rationalising, ignoring and even denying anything that doesn’t fit in with the his core belief”. Such false propaganda designed to shield Israel and allows Israelis to believe falsely that they’re innocent bystanders, even victims. The truth is Israel is directly involved in the foreign-backed aggression against Syria. In coordination with the U.S. and the Turkish army, the Israeli army continues its unprovoked aggression against Syria, including the recent missiles attack (05 July 2013) on the port city of Latakia. Iran is thrown in the mix by the “Left” liberals to deflect attention away from Israel. It is Israel, not Iran, which is deeply involved in the war on Syria.
Together, with the U.S., Israel is the major supplier of weapons, including chemical weapons to the terrorists to unleash against the Syrian people. Once the Western-backed terrorists were on the run, chased by the Syrian Army, Israel in coordination with the U.S. and Turkey came to their aid. The latest atrocity is a case in point. Chomsky failed to even mention that since the Western-backed violence erupted in Syria, Israel has been the only state that has openly attacked Syria unprovoked. This is consistent with Chomsky’s support for Israel, as he often said that he is “the biggest supporter of the state of Israel”.

Amos Yaldin, Israeli Intelligence Chief

Much of the war on Syria has been planned by pro-Israel Zionist think-tank like the Brooking Institute in the U.S. It is part of Israel’s Zionist ideology to dominate the Middle East by force and remove any resistance to Israel’s Zionist expansion. It is Israel which driving the U.S. to war on Syria. As former Israeli Intelligence Chief, Amos Yaldin told the audience at the Israel Policy Forum in February 2013:
“And this [Syrian] military, which is a huge threat to Israel, is now also weakening and, in a way, disintegrating. We still have risk from Syria – a risk of being an al-Qaeda country, a Somalia-type country – but from military point of view, each one of these is less dangerous than the Syrian regular army.”
In addition, the Israeli army (in coordination with the Turkish army) is on full alert on the border with Syria and coordinating with the terrorists. Furthermore, with the backing of the Israeli army, the terrorists have recently occupied the UN border post in Israeli-occupied Golan Heights. They were subsequently defeated by the Syrian Army and fled into the Israeli-occupied part of the Golan. As a result of the violence, the Austrian UN “peace-keeping” force withdrew from the area. The entire Middle East has been turned into a bloodbath specifically to enhance Israel military dominance and advance Israel’s Zionist-fascist ideology.

Hundreds of thousands of Syrians rallied in Sabaa Bahrat Square in Damascus on Wednesday in support of President Bashar al-Assad. The great majority of Syrians support Assad and the government. What is happening is not a civil war as the western media describes it. These rallies are reminiscent of the great marches by the Libyan people who supported Moammar Kaddafi before the western-backed terrorists tortured and murdered him.

In another interview with the Lebanese newspaper the Daily Star (18 June 2013), Chomsky went to great length to portray the U.S.-Israel war on Syria in an ignorant and devious term: “Syria is destroying itself”. He said: “The country is heading toward suicide, it is destroying itself and it is very dangerous.” In Chomsky parlance: It is a civil war between the Syrian people (“Sunni versus Shiite”) and we are not involved. What a crass dishonesty, false propaganda and mind-boggling distortions of reality. Chomsky knows that there is no civil war taking place in Syria. He knows that Syria is under Western-backed terrorist attacks. Chomsky knows very well who the perpetrators of the violence in Syria are and who their backers are. From the outset (March 2011), it has been Western-backed terrorists (not “peaceful demonstrators”) who have been wreaking havoc on Syria and killing civilians who opposed them. Nowhere in Chomsky’s interviews has he acknowledged that the U.S. has been training, financing, and arming the terrorist in for almost two years. He is for a UN-backed war on Syria.
Like many Western propagandists, Chomsky’s aim is to mislead the public that sectarian hate exists among Muslims and that the Syrian people are fighting among themselves. The so-called “sectarian violence” is part of the U.S.-Israel “creative chaos” strategy to fragment and divide the Middle East along ethnic and religious lines. Chomsky fails to even mention that Syria is a pluralistic society and that the overwhelming majority of the Syrian people support President Bashar al-Assad and the Syrian legitimate government. As Russia’s President Vladimir Putin accurately observed:

“The Syrian Government is the best speaker on behalf of the Syrian people and not those liver-eating terrorists”.

Chomsky knows very well that the war in Syria is not between the Syrian people, but between the Syrian legitimate Government and foreign-backed terrorists and criminal mercenaries. It is a well-known fact that what the U.S.

Members of the “Free Syrian Army” so-called using a child to behead a prisoner shown in a video the FSA circulated. Der Spiegel described the “rebels” methods of torture and slitting throats in March 2012 reporting between 200 and 250 “traitors” slaughtered by the terrorists.

and it allies, including Israel and the Gulf dictators call “rebels” are foreign-backed terrorists and mercenaries that include al-Qaeda terrorists. Their crimes ranging from eating human flesh, cutting throats, beheadings, abducting and slaughtering clergymen and scholars, recruiting children, robbing factories and transporting them to Turkey and committing hundreds of terrorists acts. We know now that the U.S. and its allies have been openly training the terrorists and supplying them with weapons and cash.
Even Chomsky’s beloved Zionist newspapers, the despicable New York Times and the Washington Post have acknowledged the U.S. role in financing and arming the terrorists against the legitimate Syrian Government. According to the Wall Street Journal, President Obama’s legal team has warned him that arming the terrorists violates international law. The terrorist were directed by their supporters (“Friends of Syria”) to attack population centres (cities and towns) as primary battle grounds to give the impression that the terrorist attacks are in fact a “civil war” between the Syria people. It is consistent with U.S.-Israel policy of targeting the civilian populations.
It is important to keep in mind that Chomsky is not just a Zionist-propagandist. Chomsky is a global propaganda corporation. His repetitive and cheap propaganda are published by his supporters in the Zionist media and spread around the world. The “Chomsky Cult” is the equivalent of BBC or CNN propaganda. It is true that Chomsky has called the U.S. and Israel “terrorist states that pose the greatest threat to world’s peace”. His empty rhetoric is designed to disguise his main propaganda thesis that, “the U.S. is the greatest and freest country in the world”, and blames the US on Israel’s war crimes rather than Israel itself. While Chomsky often criticised U.S. foreign policy, he is not fundamentally against U.S. imperialism. He once described the murderous Occupation of Iraq “incompetence” and suggested “better ways” to do it. With his Zionist leaning, Chomsky’s primary aim is to pacify people and put them to sleep. If he is honest, Chomsky needs to ask himself whose side he is on, a U.S.-Israel led murderous Zionism or a civilised community of diverse nations.
Finally, here in Australia, it is the last week of the election campaign and it is used to promote aggression, regurgitating Obama’s threat against the people of Syria. Meanwhile, the Australian Government – an obedient U.S. lapdog – is celebrating its one month Presidency of the UN Security Council. Australia’s main goal in September will be to please the U.S. regime and unconditionally supports U.S. terror in all its forms and at all costs. As the violence escalates in Syria, Australian immigration officials are busy issuing passports to Australian mercenaries joining the West-backed terror in Syria. According to the Time News, “Australians now make up the largest contingent from any developed nation in the Syrian [foreign terrorist] forces”.
Moreover, Australia’s Foreign Minister, Bob Carr (a carbon copy of his predecessor, the ignorant Alexander Downer) has called for the assassination of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in order to change the Government. Imagine the outrage had it been a Muslim leader calling for the assassination of Kevin Rudd or the ignorant Bob Carr himself. However, most Australians have none of it, if it will not stop a few thousands desperate refugees fleeing imperialism terror and trying to reach Australia by boat.
Speaking at the UN General Assembly in December 1964 in New York, the Cuban revolutionary Ernesto Che Guevara described imperialism as:

“A carnivorous animal that feeds on unarmed peoples. […] That is what distinguishes the imperial ‘white men’”. The only way to defeat this carnivorous animal is by uniting anti-imperialist local and global forces. It is a test of conscience for every Westerner and proof of whether Western civilization is anything more than a facade for brute barbarism.”

Report: France Wins Billion-Euro Saudi Defense Deal

By AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE

Aug. 29, 2013

imagesCALL11UJ

PARIS — France has won a billion-euro defense contract with Saudi Arabia to overhaul four frigates and two refuelling ships, sources said Thursday.

A source close to the matter confirmed a report on the La Tribune website saying negotiations that had dragged on for years were over.

The upkeep deal involves French weapons and systems makers Thales, DCNS and MBDA and would overhaul vessels that date to the 1980s.

None of the companies involved wished to comment, but La Tribune reported that the launch of work could come as early as September and would precede a visit to the kingdom by French President Francois Hollande this autumn.